I recently abandoned a game where I was a spiritualist empire, because I started in a location where I was boxed in by two friendly spiritualist empires. 6. If I'm playing tall, I'm aiming to keep my empire size below 100. There are Stellaris gurus that will tell you that by building up pops in preference to acquiring systems is playing tall. 75% boost to the planetary designation on. Indentured Servitude is the best kind of slavery, as it has the fewest job restrictions. Way, Way, WAAAY Too Many Thoughts on Necrophage (Strategy, Synergy, etc. My idea was to play domination and build out solid core worlds and maybe a small sector with very strong defense and then go out and subjugate the other empires. 3 and my solutions for it. I play tall and use tributaries. the tech tree ends at some point and the. 8 Archetype Play-stylespared to read, better leave. Wide dichotomy (or at least attempts to). This ironically makes the Expansion tradition really good for tall builds, since it gives bonuses to both Admin cap and pop growth speed. I think the whole tall vs wide dichotomy is dumb. The game has been around since 2016 and they. 1. It can however be pretty challenging on to get right. Stellaris has generally only encouraged "wide" play (largely because wide empires always have more pop growth, which leads to more of everything else). 1 rules, the best way to play Tall was to reduce the number of systems you controlled. Trying to conquer whole empire's as soon as met them and have a stronger fleet. Throughout my (noobish) playthroughs of Stellaris I have always tried to play wide. That doesn't mean a low amount of colonies; in fact, often more. Then tried a mixed economy run aimed at going tall and setting up strong vassals but was stymied when I realized 3 planets in 28 systems was incredibly unlucky and having anamoly researchers was actually. Best. A Dyson Sphere is a vital part of a very tall empire, and the Science Nexus can similarly propel you centuries ahead of the pack when playing a very compact empire. 273 upvotes · 38 comments. (Not super-tall though, as in one planet, but only 8 planets and about 16 systems at present. Generally, there are 3 strategies you can mix and match. That's when the mandatory late game genocide comes in handy. That require you to explore and have them in your territory. #1. Currently in 2. I think it would be cool if there was a terraformable slider. That efficiency allows your small area to develop fast and do lots with your space, with growth exceeding cap. The game design of Stellaris will always favor wide over tall. habitats as well as branch offices contribute to empire size. I believe this is OPS's most valuable asset. I then played UNE (completely normal peace loving federation builders), and a fairly decent sized starting empire worked, we even colonised a couple systems. Pick the difficulty level that matches the challenge you want to face. There's also the issue that Stellaris really hasn't had a defined tall playstyle throughout its history. Things have changed now, and playing tall is far from the powerhouse strategy it once was. The only way I can define Tall in Stellaris is when you focus heavily on science from day one to make your POP more efficient. The whole purpose of playing tall used to be to avoid going over admin cap which kept your research, campaigns, and leaders cheaper. I am enjoying playing "Tall" and focusing on tech, planets etc. To start, I'll explain my usual play-style as a Determined Exterminator; I like playing tall, and investing heavily into Physics, Society, and Engineering sciences. . Most people talk about Tall vs Wide like this: Wide involves getting a lot of territory, getting a lot of pops, and dominating the galaxy with overwhelming numbers; contrasted with playing Tall, which is about leaving a small galactic footprint but focusing your economy to keep up. 1 rules, the best way to play Tall was to reduce the number of systems you controlled. Spreading all over the map is playing wide. Clone army with the Ascendant path since you get 100 pops with +40% ruler output and +20% specialist output. 2. Playing Tall vs Wide. On the plus side, we get more unity faster without explicitly focusing it. Evokes a kind of 'hazard warning' feeling. Tall was a Stillbirth in Stellaris. I've seen a lot of people point out that playing tall in Stellaris has often basically been synonymous with just playing suboptimally, since for a long time now it's basically just meant not expanding to fill as much space or colonize as many planets as you could fill, and thus collecting less resources, all while confering little to no benefit in. With the changes made in 3. but what tall is or isn't is another debate I suppose and I didn't feel confident in getting any points across without using the terminology. /rantThe second vassal everyone will want is the Scholarium, who provides a significant bonus to research potential and valuable science tribute. There is still no better or more successful way to play the game than tech rush, expand like a virus and maxing out your fleet. In that case, megacorp is always good, and void dweller will help overcome the main downside of tall: not enough planets. The problem is that it wasn't obvious because of. Then set your fully enslaved, indentured servitude species to social welfare for the best stability and production/upkeep efficiency. Shipsets were reptilian. (influence tries to do this, but it doesn't do a good job of it at present) You just do both. This system warps the game and the way we play it in an unhealthy way. Tall isn't viable nothing in the beta makes tall viable. ago. He plays stellaris and stands above 6’5 Reply Modo44 •. Low empire size penalties. So really it's up to you. 8 tall isn't as viable anymore, can anyone give me a fleshed out strategy/perspective?If you're playing wide that sprawl is very low. I would say that spiritualist is a weak choice for tall builds; you're already going to be have really cheap edicts and low unity. Thanks. #56. ago. Other good tradition trees for Void Dwellers include Domination (more influence and housing), Prosperity (more minerals, more specialist output, another building slot). This may promote a "tall" growth of your empire, certainly helped by the presence of the Ecumenopolis, however this is a strategy that still has to find its place in the Stellaris meta. I'm crushing on tall on hardest on my current game, dominant by the 2300's, overwhelming by 2400. But don't sweat it if you play tall (few systems lots of tech) Don't piss off advanced neighbours. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. If you rely on the bastion for defense for the latter half of the. 4 planets that are high ascension level and low empire sprawl is tall, since in current Stellaris, each planet is basically the equivalent to an entire city in a game like Civilization. For example, a well-placed machine uprising could kill the galactic emperor and end the imperium, or a rebellion could end up vassalizing its parent state, and forming its own bloc. This was: The Network. Are you using the -dx11 option and borderless window, because trust me Stellaris is NOT single threaded, there was a dev blog post specifically discussing this in the past. While Tall empires aren’t currently competitively viable, there are some features that lean towards a tall playstyle, and can be used as starters, points for praise, or references for further development. Add a Comment. . The 3. #9. In 3. He noted one of the paradox devs in the Stellaris Devs clash was playing as a tall pacifist empire. Yeah, I actually agree I don't think Stellaris really has 'tall' playstyles because of the way pops and economics work, I don't think you so much as play tall, but as varying levels of efficient. OPS is an excruciatingly tall play-style, but I do promise you'll pick up interchangeable skills that'll enhance your tall play. hirtes Mar 29, 2020 @ 6:30am. 3. Stellaris players aren't at all happy with the AI habitat spam that plagues their games and have rallied yet again, begging Paradox to address the grand strategy game's long-running issue. r/Stellaris. The pop growth bonus in particular is also augmented by the bonuses of xenophobe, for a possible 30% base pop growth. And it can help a lot of your species has traits like intelligent or strong to take advantage of the bonuses, every plus 5% can help your empire survive longer. Terraforming to be 100% habitable for your pops. Report. • 2 yr. I would say the same happens playing tall. 0 wide was getting as many planets as possible while taking the large tech negatives from having those planets. Since colony ships wasn't researched at the start, I. Here's what I personally like to do, and it works for me playing tall. But the real mechanic at play with Tall vs. the new plant trait of "budding" is pretty good in this scenario as the total size of planet will increase assembly speed but that does mean you can't build machines. 5. 13. !remindme 1 day. 1" patch out on the 14th shouldn't really change habitat. That fixed a lot of problems. | Paradox Interactive Forums. If you stick to 10 systems and spam a bunch of habitats you are playing tall. Its more a general approach to stay small and go for quality or quantity. 1 energy. There are others (edict upkeep + tradition cost) but the research penalty seems to be the most meaningful part given how rapidly a high. Tall since well, ever, hasn’t been a great option but now more. It doesn't mean it must be. It's that time again, the 4th big overhaul for Stellaris has arrived, which means that all tutorials can be thrown out of the window and it's time to start n. But to really take advantage of that small empire size, you need to focus on research and unity. Hold chokepoints and rush tech, make friends and sign commercial pacts, start a trade league as soon as possible once you have one close ally, spam corporate embassies in your branch offices, and very soon you will be the only. The wide playstyle embraces sprawl inefficiency like a friend absorbing everything it can, heedless of the diminishing returns. But it’s basicaly giving yourself a handicap for little to no reason. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement. We have "wide with many systems" and "wide with few systems, but those systems contain thirty billion habitats". That destroys federations) remove term limit. Expand at all costs! Wide in general, less-wide if you intend to do an early war of conquest. With the changes made in 3. With wide you need a ton of governors, and must be replace them constantly. 3 is a bad idea. If you end up in an empty corner of the galaxy with a lot of space to yourself, playing tall is just a pure handicap. "Tall" as compared to "wide" is generally presumed to be going really high development on a low number of cities/planets (depending on your game), rather than low development of. ago. Just, because something is. Today I have the first new basic build in a while. Discussion. This is in part due to victory conditions which allow a "tall" strategy to work throughout the game, but also because you can leverage your "tall" advantages into a temporary tech advantage at the right times to break out as a large conqueror -- you don't need to. Building slots don’t expand from population anymore and city districts do not expand them; so, every habitat will be a few slots big until end game. The benefit from playing Tall should be that you make amends, and strong alliances with nearby neighbors, you're not a threat, and they like that. Agreeing with PsySom here. If you play habitats you can get more resources from jobs without actually taking up more space. Right now it is not viable to play a small/tall empire. A tech tree geared to this Play style would be. I keep seeing stuff around the internet about 2. Playing tall works. It's basically how you use your influence. This is going to be my updated take on the basic builds. Driven Assimilators are some of the easiest robot empires to play. Set Galaxy to 4 Spiral Arm. In Stellaris, some people play tall by only using a single planet, some go for a small number, like your starting 3, etc. Generally it's not really practical to play tall without the Void Dwellers origin as you would need insane luck to have a good. I really love stellaris and want to try something new, but run out of ideas, also Stellaris has great communityTall vs wide use to be about science before 2. How to play tall (yes again) Alright so I've been doing a little research and i know there is a bunch of threads about this already but hear me out. Megastructures will further boost tall play style. Though I do think it will be similar to other gs games were playing wide is by far the best strategy and building tall is more something to do while waiting for the next war or something. I think my problem is that i am too eager to expend. 3 comments. Either that. 3 with the elimination of admin cap. After playing a couple variations of necrophage, I started organizing my thoughts to try and learn what worked best for me and why. The winning strategy was always to expand as widely as possible because doing that. You use the early bonuses to advantage early-mid game expansion and transitioning into a wide. ago. Megastructures aren't the only way to succeed when playing tall. I played Stellaris for at least 200 hours before I won my first game. If you want to play a Machine Empire with a special starting world, you could pick the origin that starts you on a Machine world. Admin cap is super important since you're more sensitive to sprawl penalty. So today we're going to take a look at a general overview of how to play a Tall empire. The "3. If you get stuck with it, ignore this step. How to win at Stellaris: Play Wormhole only. . Friendly-General-723 Collective Consciousness 8 mo. T. Go to Stellaris r/Stellaris. ) Tip. In just one year, that's 3600 minerals conserved. In some updates, it was a very effective strategy to get ahead technologically and get early ascensions - it's much less the case now. While playing tall was pretty much building a lot of frontier outposts and having at most 3-4 planets. You want to find all the enclaves asap, kill monsters for more tech, and just generally get that tech up. . The guaranteed strategic resources is helpful if you end up not having any in your corner of space (plus it gives higher chances of researching those techs for extraction). The first 1000 people who click the link will get 2 free months of Skillshare Premium: Playing Tall has always been one of the more elu. If you play habitats you can get more resources from jobs without actually taking up more space. Mar 4, 2022. The 0,1 penalty is the +10% penalty per system other than the first one. Because it is not wide that is better, it is big. I would say it's not even extra steps anymore, since there's no way you'll get enough leaders to effectively sector an integrated vassal. In reality it would be just the same wide play, just with fewer systems. Playing tall is not only possible, it's insanely powerful and (on Insane), I am always the most powerful empire in the galaxy by 2400. This means any advice for "Tall" play needs to be tailored to the specific kind of run you're playing, which makes it kinda pointless to categorize them together. How to play tall in stellaris: Switch your game version in the steam launcher to something from 30 years ago before admin cap jobs were added. Breeding them takes to long. Playing tall is a strategy among others, it's not really a playstyle as it can be in some other games (well, mostly Civ5 in fact, and it's really just another word for turtling). 2;. If you spreadsheeted the numbers for the old sprawl system, the best empire size for optimal tech output was around 20 planets, which is much larger than most people would consider to be tall, and even then such an empire's tech advantage only started to be. 3 a LOT. That’s 350x the population of China with much more area and a much more productive and advanced economy not just capable of building highways and skyscrapers, but advanced megastructures and entire artificial worlds. All in all though I think this build I'm playing is more static than I like. I personally think thats fine, because I think that playing tall SHOULD be a challenge. . Jump to latest Follow Reply. But in Stellaris it seems rather doubtful if you could play tall instead of wide. Yeah, I actually agree I don't think Stellaris really has 'tall' playstyles because of the way pops and economics work, I don't think you so much as play tall, but as varying levels of efficient. Stellaris isn't designed for playing tall really. Stellaris 2 really needs to have closer to Victoria pops. That doesn't mean a low amount of colonies; in fact, often more. Good picks: Rapid/Slow Breeders and Nomadic/Sedentary: Getting more pops quicker. Warscore, the fleet manager, land warfare, etc. Go to Stellaris r/Stellaris • by Nimitz-View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Fluffy-Tanuki Agrarian Idyll • 4 mo. . Trade with AI using rare resources to get rid of workers. Realistically when going tall it means some small set of orbital mines and research stations that weren't your core priority anyways - the core priority ones were covered by your frontier outposts to begin with. To combat sprawl, if you have the overlord DLC, you can claim these systems but then release the sector as a vassal. We will use these. Tall means you really stack all you have onto a few systems. 2 updated for 1. It would mimick a wide. Playing "Tall" in Stellaris: a criminally misunderstood term I love Stellaris and this community! Sometimes I see people in the comments talking about how a player is trying. With the Hegemon, you will get 2 AI-powered allies who will do whatever you wish early into. What's your strategie to play Tall. Stack research until you burst, playing tall without Megacorp or Inward Perfection is tricky, and the problem is that going wide will almost always work out better for you, even with DLC. ISO system juust flexible enough to accommodate both c. I think my problem is that i am too eager to expend. While habitats are good, it’s probably better to be funding colony ships. Tall strategies focus on having a few cities packed into smaller territory but much more heavily upgraded. But the tall/wide distinction isn’t all that meaningful in Stellaris — you’re still managing more worlds and taking up more empire size, just in a smaller geographical space. Ryika Jan 29, 2022 @ 11:08pm. In Stellaris tall is an RP/aesthetic/laziness based preference, not a strategy for optimizing a win, for all the reasons people have posted. Turn a planet into an ecumenopolis and set them to work on whatever you need (alloys, unity, consumer goods) or research ring/relic world. Stellaris "Tall" mainly means getting as much resources as possible out of a small(er) space. This is the God-Emperor Origin in Stellaris. Your main species is fine for gaia worlds and relic worlds, but anything else will require a different species. And in a game about choice the choice to play Tall or Wide should actually matter. but what tall is or isn't is another debate I suppose and I didn't feel confident in getting any points across without using the terminology. If you don't have to fight anyone for that space, it's free space, take it. But you're right. Hello my most pious followers. Make sure you are the only megacorp (by force if necessary) and make a trade federation or hegemony (depends on what you want to accomplish) become custodian (not emperor. It's okay to limit yourself to a smaller, more defensible slice of space, at least initially. 3. Key ethic: Fanatic PacifistKey civic: Beacon of LibertyKey trait: Docile/Streamlined Protocols Key traditions: Dom. Tall vs Wide is now about unity. "Tall" as compared to "wide" is generally presumed to be going really high development on a low number of cities/planets (depending on your game), rather than low development of a high number of cities. Base habitat, with the size modifier, will have maybe half population growth from size penalties. With that in mind I think it's a step in the right direction for that kind of. The tall playstyle dines like a gourmet only picking the very best and shunning the crud. And Ringworlds would still have that drawback. InflationCold3591. RodHull (Banned) Apr 22, 2021 @ 2. Whether it be just one county or a small duchy, the player uses all of their resources to funnel a small area on the map. . There also needs to be a way to join and white peace in-progress wars when you aren't the primary target (say, costing influence). The concept of playing tall is not a fixed one, it kinda depends on how you see it. By building robots and getting % pop growth speed modifiers. Your empire’s planet is going to explode. A truly tall empire does not incur the sprawl in the first place. Step 1. That is, you stay small for some time so you can: - focus on science. 1. 419K subscribers in the Stellaris community. A wide playstyle is playing to do well. For tall since you aren't conquering pops you MUST grow them. And size of empire directly influences size of your navy. Stellaris has an abstraction for Tall vs Wide in-game: the Empire Size mechanic. ago. If you don't have to fight anyone for that space, it's free space, take it. Too many planets to manage. Build Starbase at choke points, not on all outposts. There are several reasons for this but the primary factors are how pops are obtained, how resources are produced, and the way new things are created. They have a 100 pop max capacity and 35% bonus on specialist/ruler output. All strategies assume you are trying to get maximum pops & maximum jobs on every planet. Sorry mate but it kinda sounds more like you are just being a sore loser here. also if you're mass vassalizing that's not really tall play, that's just playing wide with extra steps. ChronicallyDepressed. All research, economic growth and army production. Playing tall infers having fewer and more productive planets instead of a ton of mediocre planets. But i definitely struggle when it comes to playing a more aggressive empire like the Commonwealth of Man or the Determined Exterminators. This along with the +25% growth from devouring swarm AND +15% food bonus means some crazy fast breeding. However, I am interested in playing tall, since maybe this is the best strategy for me. But it’s basicaly giving yourself a handicap for little to no reason. I too like to normally play wide, but I'll switch it up with a tall megacorp. There is a heatmap for that out there on the internet. So you can play builds that are better at tall but your going to lose out late game. 3. 3 base systems + 2 from finishing Expansion traditions + 2 from Efficient Bureaucracy civic + 5 from Imperial Prerogative ascension perk (and maybe another 2/4 if you can stomach playing pacifist plus whatever core sector technologies you can research) is more than enough to get you orbital habitats. stellaris is a dynamic game, and rebellions and other events always change up the galaxy. You get more yeild from the planet as far as resources plus more space for research labs. It is way to easy to spam Burocrats to avoid any penalties from rapid expansion. Stellaris Tall Build Guide. Playing tall was heavily nerfed with changes to habitats. 22 Badges. 3. Use the outpost cost ethic and build plenty of outposts. After spending 82 let’s play episodes on insane difficulty (watch it here: ) testing the viability of a tall. If you play at lower difficulties, then the game is designed to be a chill roleplaying experience. That's a 70% increase. The rules I'm playing with prevent me from ever having any colonies outside my starting system - this isn't as restrictive as it could be since the disk has 6 size 90 worlds on it. Ideally you would want to begin a period of rapid expansion towards the end of filling out this tree. Stellaris has no such restrictions, in fact it’s the opposite; there are almost no consequences for conquering other empires early, you even have choices depending on your situation, and early conquests allow you to conquer even more mid to late game. Playing tall means you concentrate on maxxing out a small number of planets and systems, but I just find it inferior to playing wide, winning aside you just miss out on a tonne of content like the architectural digs, leviathan's, etc. tall mechanism, so you are not forced to conquer new territories to become stronger. "Playing tall" in Stellaris is always purely a roleplaying decision. I've read on here that playing tall in 2. (Not super-tall though, as in one planet, but only 8 planets and. If you want to play a game where Tall playstyle is possible, play Endless Legend. Bureaucrats killed tall. 0 making playing tall a viable strategy. Remember, planet growth slows when you are expanding, so a constant early game expansion slows your making use of said things. Unlike Civ, we don't really have a hard dichotomy that swings one way or the other. More systems=more stuff. Yes, even when playing wide you still try to play as tall as possible but you first focus on expansion. There is no tall game-play in Stellaris, in the sense of having a very few or small number of super planets vs. What i would really like, is to play a geographically small empire but with high population planets and systems (i believe it's possible to have pops on a space platform, but i never seen them). Finally, Part 3 contains a mix of tips and tricks for you to use to take your roleplaying to the next level. Tall builds are barely viable with DLCs, without them they're basically impossible. I don't understand how playing tall in this game works. You cannot go tall, becuase you have already cut off your legs and stumped your hands by going standard hive. Enjoy your stratified society. You can do quite well by building a few colonies on nice big planets, and using wars to establish a lot of vassals and tributaries. I cant play stellaris this weekend to try and min max this build, so monday I can give you a stronger suggestion. TLDR, I think tall isnt dead, it is just more gradient. You can also do this as a machine intelligence but its entirely a different strategy. We have "wide with many systems" and "wide with few systems, but those systems contain thirty billion habitats". Those would be some of the most basic types of non-linear mechanic which could make Tall play start to exist. In fact it could be easier with more resources. Here is what I have to report back: -This mod is very impressive and proves a greater challenge than Glavius mod by far. In previous patches, especially before 3. That's enough to fight 25x in 2300. The tall vs wide playstyle has devolved from: tall (low systems low planets) vs wide (many systems many planets) to a new style of tall (low systems many planets/Habs) vs wide as it was before. With that being said, playing tall in Stellaris is a lot harder than you think! How, then, can you get started playing tall in this game? Keep reading to discover our comprehensive guide! Set Your Limits How to play tall? I thought the changes to unity, particularly the planetary ascension mechanic, would make it ideal for a corporate empire to play tall, so I gave it a shot. 3; 1; 1; Reactions:. Tall really does not exist in Stellaris as you can be wide without expanding allot of territory. It was never viable, and it's not even possible now with the new empire size changes. 0 growth). I would say it's not even extra steps anymore, since there's no way you'll get enough leaders to effectively sector an integrated vassal. 6 put the nails in the coffin, but Tall had one patch where it was "good" and that was quickly fixed. That also doesn't fix a billion unnecessary pop ups per game, half of the anomalies requiring manual intervention that consisted of "click buttan. Option A is to build up your internal economy, with any commercial or trade agreements being bonuses to your own production. You can still play that way. First things first; your ethics should be materialist. Ryika Jan 29, 2022 @ 11:08pm. Thread starter Tuna Cat;. These changes will force players to decide whether to focus on fully developing what little. Play tall on the short term, get bio ascension, make sturdy and strong pops, then start a conquering spree. In a perfect run you would just grow large nough to start the vassalisation chain and then even shrink yourself a bit if over 100. . The ultimate wide starting origin which is void dwellers gets called tall showing how much the community have absolutely no idea what they are talking about. You'll have to resettle, buy slaves or aquire more pops later to fill this world. playing tall or wide doesnt matter if you play in singleplayer BUT playing tall in. Today I have the first new basic build in a while. Alternatively, you can use automation, which is actually pretty easy and works well enough for most people. A Void Dweller run will play completely differently from a Nihilistic Acquisition raider run, which will play completely differently from a one-planet-challenge run. Both can do it well as planets are not the bottleneck any more for science generation. Two strategies stand out when we talk about empire size. #12. Enslaving conquered populations is tricky and requires a lot of pop shuffling. 2. 7. For a one-system challenge the best (but not most. When i play these it often ends. Though 25x crises was a serious challenge. hirtes Mar 29, 2020 @ 6:30am. I believe the large consensus among Stellaris players who pay attention to meta is that, in 2.